Хиллари - королева коррупции
Oct. 7th, 2016 06:13 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
slavka"2016 election is a referendum on government corruption"
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/presidential-campaign/299568-2016-election-is-a-referendum-on-government
The saddest casualty of the Hillary Clinton email scandal is the, perhaps, irreparable institutional damage done to the FBI by its director, James Comey. It is now clear that he never intended to conduct a proper investigation and, for purely political reasons, he was never going to recommend prosecution. In essence, Comey gave FBI blessing to a double standard of justice, one for powerful people like the Clintons and one for the rest of us.
The FBI destroyed evidence in a criminal investigation forever preventing the use of that evidence in any pending or future case.
As part of a “side agreement” brokered by the Department of Justice, Comey agreed to destroy the laptops of Clinton aides Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson, after the two women were granted immunity.
Earlier, referring to Mills, who was Hillary's chief of staff at the State Department, Comey stated in testimony before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee that “we have no evidence to establish that she committed a crime,” in relation to Hillary’s use of a personal email server.
If Comey did not believe Mills committed a crime, then why would she need immunity and why would the evidence need to be destroyed?
The exoneration of Hillary Clinton was an act of government malfeasance, a conscious choice favoring political expediency over the principle of “equal justice under law” in order to preserve a corrupt status quo.
via
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/presidential-campaign/299568-2016-election-is-a-referendum-on-government
The saddest casualty of the Hillary Clinton email scandal is the, perhaps, irreparable institutional damage done to the FBI by its director, James Comey. It is now clear that he never intended to conduct a proper investigation and, for purely political reasons, he was never going to recommend prosecution. In essence, Comey gave FBI blessing to a double standard of justice, one for powerful people like the Clintons and one for the rest of us.
The FBI destroyed evidence in a criminal investigation forever preventing the use of that evidence in any pending or future case.
As part of a “side agreement” brokered by the Department of Justice, Comey agreed to destroy the laptops of Clinton aides Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson, after the two women were granted immunity.
Earlier, referring to Mills, who was Hillary's chief of staff at the State Department, Comey stated in testimony before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee that “we have no evidence to establish that she committed a crime,” in relation to Hillary’s use of a personal email server.
If Comey did not believe Mills committed a crime, then why would she need immunity and why would the evidence need to be destroyed?
The exoneration of Hillary Clinton was an act of government malfeasance, a conscious choice favoring political expediency over the principle of “equal justice under law” in order to preserve a corrupt status quo.
via
